This, by far, is the number one criticism I seem to get in my negative book reviews. I never quite know what to think of it. On the one hand, a reader wouldn’t say something like that unless they thought it was good, since if they hated the book completely they would say something like “it was blessedly short” (and yes, I have gotten reviews like that). On the other hand, some of them really get worked up about it, to the point where I doubt they’ll ever read anything I write ever again.
Just to be clear, I’m not opposed to negative reviews, and I’m not responding to any of my reviews in particular. As a matter of principle, I believe that reviews are for readers and not for writers. I don’t generally respond to reader reviews except in very rare cases, and never to tell the reviewer that they’re wrong.
With that out of the way, what does “too short” actually mean? I can’t speak for all readers, but for me, when a book is too short it usually means that something in the story itself felt unsatisfying. In other words, something felt undeveloped, or rushed, or cut short without ever coming to a conclusion (or, in the case of cliffhangers, at least to a natural stopping point). In other words, “too short” isn’t a function of words or of pages, but of the story itself.
I’ve read short books that felt like they fit their length perfectly. A Short Stay in Hell comes immediately to mind. That book is a thin novella, barely more than a hundred pages in print, and yet it comes together so masterfully that I honestly don’t know what else could be added to make it longer. I would love to have more time to explore that particular world, but as it is, the story comes together perfectly within its own length.
That said, there are other books that I felt were too short even though they did fit their own length. That Leviathan Whom Thou Hast Made is an example of an award-winning book–clearly well written, clearly well constructed–that left me unsatisfied because it felt too short. Here, though, it was less a problem with the story itself and more just that I wanted more time to explore the alien culture of the swales. I would love to read a full-length novel set in the same universe, if for nothing else than for the fascinating world-building.
This makes me wonder: are there certain forms of fiction that tend to get more ire from readers just because of the constraints of the form? Do some readers hate novelettes just because they’re novelettes, or serials just because they’re serials? Judging from my own reviews, that seems to be the case. Even if I wrote the best novelette in the world, they would hate it because it’s not a novel.
So what am I supposed to do when readers tell me that my books are too short? Should I set a minimum word count and not publish anything unless it goes over that word count? I really don’t think so, because that sounds a lot like padding. Instead, the only solution that I can see is to focus on telling the best story and to not even worry about the length until it’s finished (and even then, only to know whether to label it a novel or a novella).
In the case of series, sometimes it can be difficult to tell whether to bring a certain thread to a conclusion or to leave it unresolved as part of the overall series arc. Certainly, each individual story needs to have an arc of its own, even if it ends on a cliffhanger. I’m still learning as I go, especially when it comes to writing series. But it’s certainly a lot of fun for me, and I hope it’s fun for you too as a reader.
In short, there’s not much I can do other than keep telling stories as best as I know how, and learn what I can from each story in order to tell better ones in the future. If “too short” means that something was unsatisfying, I’ll do my best to learn from it. But I’m not going to pad my novellas into novels just to hit a certain page count. The story itself should determine its own length.
Well, reviews are mysterious gobbledygook that come out of the ether. They can say practically anything. Some highly-paid authors who write universally-acclaimed books still get AWFUL reviews on the interwebs. And some of those reviews read like the review-writer had never read the book. That’s why a lot of successful authors teach budding wannabes (like myself) that they should never read any reviews for their own books.
Seriously, if the length of a work is a reader’s chief (or only) concern, then he can just read the dictionary like an honest lunatic.
Yeah, it’s never a good idea to place too much stock on reviews. In that respect, too many good reviews can actually be dangerous to a writer, since they boost your ego so much that you start to rely on reviews as a measure of your writing skills, so that when that inevitable bad review comes, it puts you into a massive funk for a while. I wish that I could go without reading my reviews, but it drives me even crazier to know that people are talking about my books and not to know what they’re saying. If you can train yourself not to read your reviews, that is a skill that will serve you well.
You’re not the only one getting “it was too short” as a strike against you when it’s a novelette to begin with, other friends of mine are hitting the same reaction. I think the main thing is to be up-front about the length, make sure all your works clearly specify that it’s short fiction as opposed to a novel. Maybe in the future put it on the cover (since it’s too late to do that for your main series, I wouldn’t worry about that right now), but it looks like you already have that specified in the description.
Otherwise… Yeah, there are people who don’t like short fiction and only like novels. But kudos to them for trying new things! Even if they ended up reaffirming that yes, they still don’t like it.
I’ve been thinking about this topic too since I have a couple of novelettes I’d like to do something with in the future…
Labeling is probably quite important, though I doubt that word-length means much of anything to readers these days (or that many of them even read far enough into the description to catch how short it is).
I guess that people like to read stuff like the stuff they’ve read and enjoyed before. If that’s mostly novels, then it’s mostly novels. If it’s mostly short stories, it’s mostly short stories. To get them hooked on a new and unfamiliar form, you can’t just write a good book, you have to write an outstanding book that they won’t easily forget. Which is, of course, the thing that we’re all striving to do.
Good luck! And thanks for the comment!
Oh, another thought just hit me. I think part of the “problem” is that you’re experimenting, and anything that’s an experiment, whether it be in length, format, or style, won’t be as satisfying to those who are just looking for the norm, something that will be a comfort read.
So yeah, feedback/reviews are hard to parse through because there are so many variables…
Thanks. And yeah, you can’t expect an experiment to satisfy everyone. But when that experiment is your bread and butter, you can’t help but feel a little uneasy about what people think of it.